Playing Hades 2 on desktop, Hollow Knight on deck, and Anno 117 is coming out in a month… Not to mention the five other games I added to my backlog this year and haven’t touched yet.

I will be skipping this sale, methinks.

Docmost?

I had a two bay Synology device for many years before I upgraded to a home lab. I liked it quite a bit as a beginner. The interface was easy to use, dead simple to set up the basics, and it had some advanced capability for those curious.

I’d strongly recommend a “plus” model. They are usually only slightly more expensive than their non-plus counterpart for a fairly significant upgrade.

“this fascist regime”? Wanna be a little more specific?

If it’s actively glowing blue, I don’t think it’s safe to handle.

Yo this looks really cool.

I don’t think I’d actually say it’s my favourite, but the opening cinematic/menu song for Dragon’s Dogma is pretty nostalgic for me. And kinda became a meme in the games hardcore community fanbase.

🎶 The wind is pushing meeee 🎶

It’s okay to be wrong =p

Way more than mildly infuriating. The celebration of this guy is one of the most upsetting things to have happened in my lifetime.

This may be the most technically disastrous launch since Cyberpunk.

Best show <3

Literally yes.

Hope it’s good because honestly BG3 was unplayable on Steam deck for me despite being “verified”.

Is this Antifa in the room with us now?

Holy shit yes. This is a peak 19 y/o question, and I say this with no disrespect intended.

I’m in my 30s now and I really wish I had invested 15k when I was 19. I would be sitting a whole let better than I am now.

Not anything below the skin.

The toast thing is a myth.

You could try [email protected]

But my guy, you provided context which shows that Borderlands 4 does run like shit on a 4090 in a lab environment.

Borderlands 3 on highest settings with a 4090, a worse cpu, at 1440p ran at 210 average fps.

You telling me that Borderlands 4 looks good enough compared to 3 to explain a 143 fps drop?

That doesn’t really seem to contradict the other person’s claim that much? In fact like your said if just a few other things are running on that person’s pc and eating some resources, their claim seems super believable in the context of what you just said so I’m not sure what your point is.

A reviewer/tester is going to be benchmarking in a best case scenario environment. Real people using their real computers will be experiencing a huge variety of other environments. Different temps, hardware settings, programs running, etc. None of that context excuses the performance, and makes that person’s performance claim believable.