Just call it an URO and be done with it.

Ai can generate hands with a billion fingers, but it can’t count so i guess they’re not likely ai after all.

I call fake, anyone who thinks like this died in a roof collapsing on them while they slept.

Edit: because they suck at building a house i mean, I guess they could have bought a house but nobody sells houses for an amount you can count with your FINGERS.

I’ve read both are true. Tourism + digital nomand, because Portuguese weather is good and lisbon is relatively affordable, but i’m sure a local could give you a better answer.

Prison time last i heard, but not sure tbh

If 6x7=42 than 6x7 is also the answer to the ultimate question of life, the universe and everything. According to my math teacher at least

I like the second one a lot, especially how the upper and bottom numerals face the floor and the left and right ones face towards the center, and to allow for that there has to be a sudden flip from 3>4 and 8>9. But the indices are not playing by the square-clock rule and unlike the cartier one form a regular oval shape.

I like how the upper one had to find a way to make clear which indice represents the numerals - it really shows the problem in projecting the circular movement of the hands into a rectangular (thanks, that’s the right word) shape.

It think most analog clocks/watches will give you an old-timey whiff much more often than not, just because there is a more new-timey alternative. I went looking for some watch faces for smart watches, but couldn’t really find any interesting one. Most are either digital numbers or a round clock on a rectangular display.

Neither of those interest me like the Cartier tank, which I find really ugly watches to be honest. It’s just this double outlined rectangle(-ish shape) which is unevenly split into 60 boxes that I like (seen below on the first, third and fifth watch).

Cartier found a work around quite some time ago and maybe they weren’t even the first to design a square ‘clock’:

(The roman numerals are nice, but notice the ‘circle’ between the numerals and the hands, almost like the circle from the ai)

I heard the term waay before i understood the word came into being because someone wrote a book about the phenomenon that didn’t have a name yet. Somehow i assumed this was a phenomenon that existed forever, instead of a few decades.

such a variety of failure modes

What i find interesting is that in both cases there is a certain consistency in the mistakes too - basically every dementia patient still understands the clock is something with a circle and numbers and not a square with letters for example. LLMs can tell you cokplete bullshit, but still understands it has to be done with perfect grammar in a consistant language. So much so it struggles to respond outside of this box - ask it to insert spelling errors to look human for example.

the ability to “see”

This might be the true problem in both cases, both the patient and the model can not comprehend the bigger picture (a circle is divided into 12 segments, because that is how we deconstructed the time it takes for the earth to spin around it’s axis). Things that seem logical to use, are logical because of these kind of connections with other things we know and comprehend.

Removed by mod

By far the best, but still off. These three were loaded in the same order as i post them:

I thought the same, until it refreshed and it got worse and it refreshed and it was different but still bad. These three were loaded in the order as posted:

It’s not ‘% of people’ but ‘% of journeys’, so according to the data 1 in 25 journeys is with public transport. Still feels off to me, but could be they’ve tried to avarage the data according to the population and if it would for example include teens and elderly it would make a lot more sense already. I’m also not sure if they allowed for journeys with multiple modes of transport, if you for example cycle to the trainstation take a train and then walk to your destination will it count for 3 journeys (which would lower the % of journeys by car) or would it count as one (with public transport being left out of the count, artificially raising the % of journeys by active transportation)

How about that sub-saharan city where 90% walk everywhere, also an outlier.

Totally agree, the graph in my eyes is pretty clear it is the labeling that is shitty because it tries too hard to be clear. There is the letters of each point (A, B and C) which get the largest heading, but because they are only one letter long they do not appear as the main information. Then there is the description of each axis as second heading acompanied by symbols that do not really add anything, and then the discription of each point as a third heading which just float around in a random spot. Chaos.

I agree, even the less obvious ones as having a good attitude or being on times arent things that requires effort (like whoever scrawled on the picture scrawled).

Not favourite-[term of mine] but [favourite term]-of mine obv. But grammar matters and you’re right

Sexual frustration bonus