Alt account of @[email protected] for looking at stuff Beehaw defederated

https://keyoxide.org/BAF9ACFBBA5B9A51A680D77CEF152DAE039C5CF5

  • 3 Posts
  • 900 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 26th, 2023

help-circle







  • amusingly, strategically in gridiron football it is to your advantage to run the clock any time you have any lead no matter the down, distance, or quarter. the load management of the game makes it so that it’s to your offense’s advantage with a lead to keep the opposing defense on the field as the clock runs.

    gridiron football is a game of action in which the goal of the action is to maintain inaction. contrast with the other american pastime sport, baseball. that’s a game of inaction in which the goal of the inaction is to suddenly spark action. and the very most exciting game in baseball is the one where one pitcher renders the other team completely inactive.

    us americans are a confounding bunch. there’s a reason Canada had to be who invented our third most popular sport, basketball



  • https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Grange

    fraternal order with an overall left-wing populist stand on most things founded right after the civil war. fundamentally, granges represent a form of mutual aid with a bit more structure, a bit more hierarchy, and a bit more pre-existing connections into local communities than starting a new mutual aid project from scratch.

    they’re a bit more direct in how they seek to help people through politics than things like the odd fellows or rotary clubs, but also a little bit more explicitly political. that said, for the experience of being in a church and removing harmful aspects, they have a lot of the same features:

    • community meetings
    • broad coordination of support across long distances
    • a purposeful attempt to influence society at large through outreach and financial influence






  • i think bicameralism has a place IF we actually learn from the Haudenosaunee Confederacy instead of just half ass copy their homework like we did last time. we gotta do it right and actually build anti-authoritarian systems into our ways of being. our founding fathers were a bunch of oligarchs who were still pretty sure an enlightened autocrat might be the way



  • there’s a lot of good replies here that approach the issue from different angles. the biggest one being “who benefits from mass surveilance.” in this current climate, that is the cops. the cops have spent the last 15 years showing us that they are not accountable to anyone or anything. you propose that video evidence will help hold cops accountable. my issue is that we already have video evidence in many cases and they’re still not. take it back to Rodney King, if you want. the cops have never faced consequence even when it’s clear they’re in the wrong.

    so then what happens with more surveillance availabe? the police have an easier time carrying out their activities, which so often includes extra judicial killings. the reason us americans are wary of expanding the surveilance state is we’ve been doing that every year since 2002. none of us are safer. the extrajudicial killings have not stopped, they’ve only gotten more visible and are used as a form of terrorism. i understand where you’re coming from that you find our attitude odd, but a lot of it stems from first hand experience that more evidence of police wrongdoing continues to not bring us closer to any police reform