What am I looking at here? It just always goes to the first case right? 🤔
It’s not the real issue. I introduced that while anonymizing the data. It’s that a 3-5 liner code became a huge switch case by just incrementing the code and never thinking how it should be done. This was caused by like 15 engineers in time :)
Something like below would be huge improvement:
subs1 = ["cluster1", "cluster2"] if subs1.contains(clusterName) return subs1Lol. Dude, you can’t do that to a bunch of coders and not expect them to read it literally.
Yep that’s on me:) let’s call this second breakfast!
Love you fam. :)
Lecturer: “Always comment your code.”
Student: “The code documents itself!”
Also student: [see screenshot]
How do I view this image in full resolution on Jerboa? Currently only able to see the low res version
There’s a download button in the top right. Not really convenient though, as you then need to go find the downloaded picture yourself.
Thank you, this helps, although jerboa really should have a button for full res right next to the download button.
no one looks behind and questions how and why.
No time in the development cycle for code review/refactors?
It is, but If you review 3 lines of pr and not the whole 50 lines of the file without thinking of the overall picture, this happens. I got this while reviewing a pr like this. And most probably I approved similar prs for this file in the past. Shame on me too…
If any post was ever deserving of a +1 this is it right here.
And no reason to state this is from production.
