• irish_link@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    Good.

    If 20 people accused an officer of misconduct, and there’s only one accusation that has proof all of them should still be know.

    If I’m a bad actor, I’m not gonna make it easy for someone to prove it.

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Do you have any idea how insanely high the burden of proof is for cops?? It’s nearly impossible to meet, even when their misconduct is blatantly obvious.

      Given that, this is a bad ruling that makes it even easier for bad cops (but I repeat myself) to escape consequences for their actions than it already is.

      Missed the “apostrophe t” part 🤦😄

      • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        Maybe you misinterpreted the ruling? This says that law enforcement cannot withold discipline records on the basis that the accusations are unproven.