• Jacobp100@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Kind of odd article saying this sort of legislation is bad because it adds features that would be susceptible to scope creep - we already have content blocking in browsers

    • Kit Sorens@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ad-blocker-blockers are already coming up in Chromium. Surely they could make a stronger argument otger than bloatware in modern software.

  • SapphicFemme@lib.lgbt
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Sure there’s a better way that can’t be easily bypassed… Idk allowlist maybe of all known safe domains, any new sites, must register for dns at the government instead of through a private org.

    Another solution allowlist all know webhost who will regularly perform audits of the sites they host for illegal content and remove + report to french authorities. At least these would be better than this easily bypassed “solution”…

    • iopq@vlemmy.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I recently bought a domain. But it’s for a year, it might take the government all of a year to approve it, and by that time the domain name renewal would be more expensive.

      ISPs also don’t necessarily host sites