Edit: This link is outdated, see new poll here https://programming.dev/post/190520

Hey everyone

Wanted to run a poll about the community icons to choose between a couple options

Option 1 - Use UBP icons - Use unified icons for all of the communities similar to beehaw

Option 2 - Use UBP for general communities and specific language, etc. icons for specific communities

Option 3 - Dont use UBP icons

Vote using the strawpoll here (doing strawpoll so it can be ranked voting) [removed in favor of new post]

EDIT: I have remade the poll with two more options. If you voted in the previous one please vote again in this. The new options are just for adding different colored gradients to the unified icons for different communities

Quick example of this:

  • young_broccoli@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Maybe just let each communities decide? If some want to have a uniform theme between them let them have it and if others don’t too. Like, I wouldnt like to see any style, or lack of, being enforced on anyone.

  • RandomDevOpsDude@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I can’t vote due to VPN, but the UBP icons look awesome, and I think using them across the board will look great. With specific language icons, can still use the actual icon with the modified color gradient (like git community is) and still gets the point across and looks great IMO.

  • Daan@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I like the bottom one the best (option 3) for the reason that they have different colours. The colour tells something about the community you’re looking for.

    A 4th option where you still have the UBP icons, but with the colours as shown in the bottom picture would be a good middleground.

    just my two cents

  • Ategon@programming.devOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Due to issues with this poll would you guys be open to running it again on rcv123?

    Things that would change

    • Random ordering of options
    • Better descriptions of options
    • Handling so theres no accidental voting
    • Better ranked system (transferable vote instead of points)
  • JackbyDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Can you elaborate on the option of UBP but with different gradients?

    The wording of the options is a little confusing.

    • Ategon@programming.devOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah I just edited the post to do a quick example

      Just means that instead of the usual blue purple gradient communities all have their own color scheme to separate them from each other

      ex. the godot icon may have the godot colors, functional programming will have an orange gradient, etc.

  • Jim@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m getting a timeout for the strawpoll. I don’t really care that much, but I think it’s nice to not use UBP. Variety is the spice of life.

  • 𝕊𝕚𝕤𝕪𝕡𝕙𝕖𝕒𝕟@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I have a question. If these were the final results (in descending order of votes):

    • x1 votes for UBP icons for non-language-specific communities
    • y1 votes for UBP everywhere
    • y2 votes for colorful UBP everywhere
    • x2 votes for colorful UBP icons for non-language-specific communities
    • z votes for no UBP icons

    Where y1 + y2 > x1 + x2, so more people wanted UBP everywhere but because of the two independent options (where to use them and what color), their votes got fragmented, what is the right course of action?

    I think it would have been better to have two polls, one about the question of using visually consistent icons and another one about what they should look like.

    • l4sgc@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      My top choice for icon shape is definitely the vertical hexagons we have now, but the poll should probably include options for both vertical and horizontal hexagons. Maybe square and squircle as well.

      • ruffsl@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I think this should be done via CSS, rather than baking in the masked shape into the PNGs. We could customize our instance’s default bootstrap theme for Lemmy-UI. This would allow us to keep the icon artwork unaltered as full-size square canvases, then mask them client side based on the user’s preferred theme or custom layout. E.g. allowing the user to distinguish user avatars versus community icons based on masking shape, like on GitHub.

        There is a growing development of RES like user side enhancements for Lemmy:

        • l4sgc@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes letting everyone choose their own icon shape is a great idea, and thanks for sharing that script, I’ve been missing the compact view!

  • spartanatreyu@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Gah, I messed up my vote. I clicked on the option I wanted (2) and then clicked vote.

    I didn’t realise it was a thing where you had to drag the options into the order that you wanted.

    Now I’ve entered a vote that is what the default order of responses is.

    Not sure why the button is called “Vote” and not “Submit” if you’re submitting an order instead of a single vote.

      • ruffsl@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, I suspect the current poll rankings are a little biased from the initial ordering of the ranked options. I think strawpoll.com’s website should randomize the initial ordering per voter, as well as ask the user to move options from one column to a second columb to make the UI more apparent that all options should be re-ranked by the voter.