• IronEagleBird@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Viera coming off the bench to drop an 8/10. His rating would definitely be higher if we won. Feels like the rest of the team let him down after we let a second goal in.

  • Astrealix@lemmy.worldOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Proof that this is completely unreliable: somehow, Havertz has the lowest on the board by far, despite this including the ref, and Trossard, who barely even touched the ball.

    • coygsu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Havertz’s rating is lower, in my opinion, because his substitute played like prime David Silva after coming on. This leads me to the conclusion that his lackadaisical, safety first play is a hindrance to the team.

      • Astrealix@lemmy.worldOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        You could say much the same about Trossard though, and I’d certainly argue he was worse. Nketiah came on and was wayyyy better.

        • coygsu@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The difference is glaring when Vieira is MOTM. Havertz’s and Kiwior’s lack of dynamism is why our forwards and wingers looked awful. Havertz more so to blame. He had instances where he could have turned into space and created chances. Mind you, Nketiah and Havertz were on the same pitch for about 10 mins or so and nothing clicked. Then Vieira came on. This doesn’t completely absolve Trossard though. He still had a bad performance.

  • Astrealix@lemmy.worldOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    (also if you’re wondering why this is on Imgur, lemmy was giving me trouble — something about a syntax error relating to JSON.)